*****SPOILERS AND SUCHLIKE, YOU GUYS******
Okay, so, five things I like and five things I was all like, “not so much,” on in The Avengers.
Liked:
1. Mark Ruffalo’s Bruce Banner/Hulk was truly fantabulous. It was funny because a couple of days before we went to see the movie, I was complaining to Ed about how many bites the Hulk has gotten at the cinematic apple (especially when so female superheros, even iconic ones like Wonder Woman can’t seem to make it out of development hell) but on our way home from the theater, I was all “I would TOTALLY watch a Mark Ruffalo Hulk movie! I would watch EIGHT OF THEM!” There’s just not time for exhaustive character study in The Avengers; there are simply too many characters. So Ruffalo’s ability to make a lot out of a little do the work of creating a more fully realized character than might exist in the script. I like his tenuous friendship with Tony Stark, his quasi-paternal relationship with Black Widow and this is all stuff that’s done with suggestion and inflection. Plus, he’s always just really appealing and relatable.
2. They did a good job of reigning in Tony/Downey Jr. I remember that that was the big worry everybody had when The Avengers appeared on the horizon: Tony Stark is such a big character and Downey Jr., as an actor, does tend to suck up the air in a room, so everyone was afraid it would wind up Iron Man & Friends: The Feature Film but the story does a good job of, for lack of a better word, side-lining him. Not that he feels undeserved or anything, but nor is he allowed to trample over the film as a whole.
3. Hawkeye! I like Jeremy Renner a lot. I like his unique, expressive face and I’ve always thought it was exceptionally good at playing a soldier; he feels real in that regard. But what I liked most about him in this was that they essentially gave him a particularly feminine plotline. For the first two thirds of the film, he is an imperiled love interest that serves primarily as motivation for a character that plays a more active role (in this case, Black Widow). And, the capper: he is given a rape-as-motivation storyline. Hawkeye is mentally violated, rather than physically, but that feeling of trespass creates his “tortured backstory” and serves as his motivation for the rest of the film. I have my own issues with rape as character, but I find it fascinating to see this applied to a male character and, whether or not I approve of the plot device, I have to recognize that it’s pretty radical to try this sort of thing.
4. The judicious use of Thor. Watching Cabin in the Woods and this more or less back to back with this has really given me an appreciation for Chris Hemsworth’s comedic chops. He has a really good sense of timing, you guys! It is possible that I didn’t watch Thor under the most favorable conditions (dubbed in French. With no subtitles. Except for French ones) but I was pretty consistently bored during Thor and I found virtually all the characters forgettable and bland. It’s possible that Hemsworth is not sufficiently compelling to carry a movie, but I don’t the character of Thor is exactly easy to make riveting. But The Avengers finds the perfect Thor dosage and really takes advantage of Hemsworth’s ability to be funny without a hint of irony (I found the scene where he attempts to leap the canyon in Cabin in the Woods was fucking hilarious, mainly because he was never, not even for a second, not playing it straight). Thor gets a lot of the best lines in this and he delivers them pretty much perfectly.
5. Robin Sparkles: Badass Military Lady Who Looks at Chris Evans’ Ass. She’s the best, right?
Not So Much:
1. Cabin in the Woods is now the second most meta Joss Whedon-penned movie out this spring! Okay, that’s not exactly true, CitW is super, super meta. But so is The Avengers and…it’s weird, you guys. As I watched the film, I could not help but feel like I was watching the work of someone who was frustrated and a little bored. The movie was all about necessity and there was never anything in there that was doing work, which isn’t a bad screenwriting tactic. The problem was, I was always really clear on exactly what work it was doing. The movie was really explicit about the storytelling moves it was making, to the point of the characters openly acknowledging it. As with Agent Coulson’s death, where he uses his dying breath to point out that he can now serve as the inciting incident that draws together the disparate team of strong personalities. It was like someone was just like “fuck it! We’ll just say what we’re doing all the time!” It comes off as more cynical than clever and, quite frankly, in this kind of escapism, I have no particular desire to watch the superhero sausage getting made.
2. The reluctance to make Black Widow appear legitimately vulnerable. I talked in the post below this about Black Widow as an effective spy and how that makes her a valuable part of the team. But, honestly, I don’t think they really write her or play her as primarily a spy. Basically, she’s really unconvincing as someone who is ever weakened or in danger. For someone who is supposed to trade on gender expectations to manipulate those around her, Black Widow is fucking terrible at that. She can’t even fake-cry properly for fuck’s sake! I felt like the screenwriters were so dead set on writing a tough, competent, snarky character that they really resisted having her ever appear to be afraid or in peril. But her job requires her to be really, really good at appearing to be in peril or afraid. Black Widow is written-and played as-a soldier. She always seems slightly uncomfortable pretending to be someone else, she half-asses the weepy woman stuff and instead offers lackadaisical sarcasm. She reminds me of that scene in Haywire where Gina Carano has to go undercover as a society lady at a cocktail party and she just leaking ill-at-ease from her pores. That’s an interesting character and one I like a lot. But I’m pretty sure it’s not how Black Widow is supposed to work. And, quite frankly, they don’t need another soldier. They need a spymaster who is so adept at wearing the faces of others that she can fool even a god.
Which brings me to…
3. Loki makes very little sense. His “plot” such as it is, is really unclear and…he doesn’t seem to actually do much to make it happen. Everything in his stated plan more or less comes to pass but pretty much without his intervention at all. The movie kind of pretends that Loki drove a wedge between the Avengers using his superior, godly powers of psychology. But, in reality, the Avengers do a pretty good job of driving a wedge between themselves all on their own. As far as I can tell, all Loki does is laugh that one time and get snowed by Black Widow. Even his “big plot,” getting Banner to Hulk out and destroy the ship seems to happen for no reason at all and certainly not because he lamely taunted Banner a couple of time (now, why the fuck Banner does Hulk out for no apparent reason despite, as we see later, being more or less able to control his freakouts, it a problem for another day. Or five.) At the end of the day, we’re told Loki does a lot but we never actually see him do much except be sort of pale and uncomfortable looking.
4. Honestly, the big, planet-ending threat is…pretty empty. Besides the whole Loki thing kind of falling flat, the giant alien flying spinal columns are just, like, whatever and all. And maybe this is partially because the Avengers themselves don’t seem to care enough. As I mentioned before, they hit Agent Coulson’s death as a galvanizing force for the crew pretty damn hard. But…the entire human race is going to be either enslaved or horribly murdered…shouldn’t they already be fairly galvanized? If the only things the major characters seem concerned about is avenging this one dude’s death, how are we supposed to feel a sense of looming threat? The enemy is ill-defined and the stakes are so cosmic that they fly well over the audience’s head.
5. There’s no time for a complete arc anywhere. There’s just too much happening in this movie. There are two many “big” characters and the movie makes a half-hearted attempt to give many of them a “traditional” hero arc. Captain America gets the “reluctant, alienated hero learns to be a leader of men,” Tony Stark has “dysfunctional, selfish loner learns to sacrifice his ego and his body for the good of the team,” Banner gets “damaged outcast learns that there is still a place for him.” These are all fine, but the problem is that none of these arcs are at all consistent. They kind of fade in and out as the script requires and, in the end, there’s no sense of triumph because none of the issues that these people have are actually surmounted. There’s no consistent forward momentum; they set up these problems and then, at the end, they’re all solved because, you know, it’s the end. That’s when problems get solved. It kind of goes back to that meta feel. The film is very jaded about many of its choices and, most damningly, it just demands we accept these kind of half-finished story threads because that’s how these movies go. It’s like its leaning so hard on the genre that it feels it doesn’t actually have to do the work and put the characters through their paces.
Tags: 5 for 5, movies, Strong Female Characters, The Avengers, thinky thoughts
































































